Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Critical Care Medicine ; 51(1 Supplement):164, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2190513

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The reduction of mortality in COVID-19 has been clinically established only for Dexamethasone and Tocilizumab to date, but the overall mortality in COVID-19 remains high. Baricitinib is a Janus Kinase 1/2 Inhibitor with known anti-inflammatory and anti-viral properties. The US FDA recently approved Baricitinib for the treatment of hospitalized adults with COVID-19 requiring either supplemental oxygen, non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We performed a meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) and observational studies assessing the effect of Baricitinib on mortality outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHOD(S): A systematic literature search was conducted on electronic databases including NIH LitCovid, WHO COVID-19 database, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central from inception until June 30th, 2022. Randomized Controlled Trials and observational studies evaluating the efficacy of Baricitinib in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were screened for the assessment of all-cause mortality as the outcome. RESULT(S): Twenty-three studies (18 observational and 5 RCTs) were included in the mortality meta-analysis. Of the 16,390 patients (4,565 observational, 11,825 RCTs), 2,139 patients died (903 out of 7,610 in the Baricitinib arm and 1,236 out of 8,780 in the non-Baricitinib arm). Using the random-effects model, the odds of mortality in the therapeutic Baricitinib use showed a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.90;p=0.008, I2=79%). A similar trend of decreased mortality was observed in the subgroup analysis by study design (Observational OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.97, p=0.04, I2=83%;RCTs OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93, p=0.01, I2=53%). CONCLUSION(S): Baricitinib used along with the standard of care treatments is associated with a reduction in mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 disease.

2.
Critical Care Medicine ; 51(1 Supplement):35, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2190462

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A rise in the incidents of violence against Health Care Workers (HCWs) in recent years calls for improvement in modes of spreading awareness and educating the public. We aimed to conduct a large global cross-sectional survey called ViSHWaS- Violence Study of Healthcare Workers and Systems in the departments of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine, and Emergency medicine. METHOD(S): A global survey after tool validation, was created using REDCap forms and distributed from June 5th to July 24th, 2022. Communication tools including emails, phone calls, SMS, and social media applications like WhatsApp, Twitter, and LinkedIn were used in securing responses. This study was deemed eligible for category-2 Institutional Review Board exempt status. RESULT(S): Total of 598 responses from 69 countries, out of these 445 (74%) were complete. The maximum responses were from India (N=49), followed by the USA (N=44) and while those from the other 67 countries ranged from N=1-30. Out of these, 221 (50%) were female, the majority (56%) were in the 26-35 years category, followed by (19%) in 36-45 years. The participants encompassed 156 (35%) consultants, 97 (22%) nurses and the rest were residents/fellows in training, auxiliary/ staff, advanced registered nurse practitioners (ARNP), physician assistants (PA), researcher and others. The vast majority (73%) reported facing violence within the past year;Verbal (63%) and physical (39%) were the most commonly reported. Total 126 (28.3%) reported that patient and/or family member as the type of aggressor they/ their colleague encountered most frequently. A majority (75%) reported that the incidence of violence has either stayed the same (39%) or increased (36%) during COVID-19 pandemic. Because of violent episodes, 48% felt less motivated/ had decreased job satisfaction;an additional 25% were willing to quit. While half of respondents were familiar with Occupational Safety and Health standards, only 20% felt prepared to handle aggressive situation. CONCLUSION(S): In this global cross-sectional survey, a majority of HCWs reported to have faced violence. They felt that it either increased or stayed the same during the COVID-19 pandemic. It has led to decreased job satisfaction. Majority of those, who responded, felt unprepared to handle the violence.

3.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 18(1): 2017734, 2022 12 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1625594

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the absence of definitive treatment, vaccination against COVID-19 emerged as an effective solution to the spread of the pandemic. This study aimed to investigate the factors impacting the rates of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Jordan, in addition to examining the relationship between COVID-19 risk perception and vaccine acceptance among the Jordanian population. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among a sample of adults (aged ≥18) residing in Jordan. Data were collected using an online questionnaire disseminated using social media platforms between December 2nd and December 29th, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 2,268 (72.3%) participants demonstrated willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. The mean COVID-19 risk perception score among the participants was 4.65 out of 10 (median 5; IQR 3-6). Higher risk perception scores were significantly associated with being female (p = .001), young (p < .001), or a smoker (p = .005). A significant positive correlation was identified between COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and risk perception scores (OR = 1.319, 95%, CI = 1.261-1.380, p < .001). Moreover, male participants (75%, OR = 1.220, 95% CI = 1.007-1.479, p = .043), participants aged 18-24 years (78.1%, OR = 1.635, 95% CI = 1.189-2.246, p = .002), and participants with children aged under 18 years (73.9%, OR = 1.210, 95% CI = 1.010-1.450, p = .039) were more willing than their counterparts to get vaccinated. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 risk perception and certain sociodemographic characteristics (i.e., being male, being young, and having children aged under 18 years) were found to be significantly associated with vaccine acceptance. Policymakers are recommended to develop public educational campaigns to enhance people's trust in and willingness to take the COVID-19 vaccine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Jordan/epidemiology , Male , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Perception , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL